DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
CGC24612227·sf·Civil·Real Property
Hearing about 2 months agoDENIED

HONG ZHENG ET AL VS. GLENN FAMA ET AL

Summary Adjudication

Hearing date
Jul 16, 2026
Department
501
Prevailing
Plaintiff

Motion type

Browse all Motion for Summary Adjudication rulings statewide →

Causes of action

Parties

PlaintiffHONG ZHENG
DefendantGLENN FAMA

Ruling

SF Superior Court - Real Property / Housing Dept 501 - CGC24612227 - July 16, 2026 Hearing date: July 16, 2026 Case number: CGC24612227 Case title: HONG ZHENG ET AL VS. GLENN FAMA ET AL Case Number: | | CGC24612227 | Case Title: | | HONG ZHENG ET AL VS. GLENN FAMA ET AL | Court Date: | | 2026-07-16 09:30 AM | Calendar Matter: | | CONTINUATION OF TENTATIVE RULING PURPOSED ONLY*** | Rulings: | | CONTINUATION OF TENTATIVE RULING PURPOSED ONLY***

4.Summary Adjudication is DENIED as to Defendants/XCs' Cause of Action for Prescriptive and/or Equitable Easement. As discussed above, there are triable issues of material facts pertaining to what property Defendants are asserting an interest in and when Plaintiffs planted the privet in the Disputed Area. When the privet was planted affects Defendants' ability to prove a prima facie case of prescriptive easement, and the evidence cited by Defendant properly disputes Plaintiff's material fact that the privet was planted in 2014.=(501/CFH)

Parties may appear in-person, telephonically or via Zoom (Video - Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849; or Phone Dial in: (669) 254-5252; Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849).

Parties who intend to appear at the hearing must give notice to opposing parties and the court promptly, but no later than 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing unless the tentative ruling has specified that a hearing is required.

Notice of contesting a tentative ruling shall be provided by sending an email to the court to Department501ContestTR@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests. A party may not argue at the hearing if the opposing party is not notified, and the opposing party does not appear. | |

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share