DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
25CV160017·alameda·Civil·Case Management
Hearing about 2 months agoOrdered to show cause why sanctions should not be imposed

JIMENEZ vs SAM

Order to Show Cause

Hearing date
Jul 21, 2026
Department
20
Prevailing
N/A
Next hearing
Sep 22, 2026

Motion type

Browse all Other rulings statewide →

Monetary amounts referenced

$500

Parties

PlaintiffPedroa Meija Jimenez
DefendantSam

Attorneys

Ara Saroianfor Plaintiff

Ruling

25CV160017: JIMENEZ vs SAM 07/21/2026 Case Management Conference in Department 20

Tentative Ruling - 07/08/2026 Karin Schwartz

ORDER RE: CASE MANAGEMENT AND ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

The Court has ordered the following after review of the case.

Plaintiff has failed to serve the complaint and file a proof of service within 60 days of filing the complaint, in violation of Cal. Rule of Court 3.110(b) and the Court's order, and failed to file a timely CMC statement per CRC 3.725 and this Court's order, or if a CMC statement was filed, it did not appear on the register of actions in time to be reviewed by the Court. (Court Order of 5/20/26; CCP 177.5; CRC 2.30; Local Rule 3.90) The Court hereby orders Plaintiff and Plaintiff's Counsel, to show cause why sanctions should not be imposed in the amount of $500. Any response to this order to show cause must be filed under oath and served at least 15 calendar days before the hearing.

The Court is also setting a further Case Management Conference at the date and time below.

All unserved parties must be served with summons/complaint/cross-complaint, a copy of this order, and proof of service filed with the court.

The Court sets this matter for an Order to Show Cause why should not be imposed for failure to file a Case Management Conference Statement. Order to Show Cause Re: Failure to File Proof of Service and CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE is set for 09/22/2026 at 03:00 PM in Department 20 at Rene C. Davidson Courthouse.

Updated Case Management Statements must be filed in compliance with Rule of Court 3.725 on Judicial Council Form CM-110.

Unless ordered otherwise, remote appearances by Zoom (videoconference) are permitted for all law and motion, case management hearings, and pretrial hearings in Dept.

20. Trials are held in person unless all parties agree to be remote.

Ara Saroian (Attorney) representing Pedroa Meija Jimenez (Plaintiff) must forthwith serve a copy of this order on all counsel of record and self-represented parties, and file proof of service. Clerk is directed to serve copies of this order, with proof of service, to counsel and to selfrepresented parties of record.

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share