DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
25CV-06755·merced·Civil·Civil
Hearing todayAppearance required

Two Jinn, Inc. vs. Luis Mendoza, et al.

Order to Show Cause Why Sanctions Should Not Be Imposed; Case Management Conference

Hearing date
Aug 27, 2026
Department
9
Prevailing
N/A

Motion type

Browse all Motion for Sanctions rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffTwo Jinn, Inc.
DefendantLuis Mendoza

Ruling

627 W. 21st Street, Merced

Thursday, August 27, 2026 10:00 a.m.

The following tentative rulings shall become the ruling of the court unless a party gives notice of intention to appear as follows: 1. You must call (209) 725-4240 to notify the court of your intent to appear.

2. You must give notice to all other parties before 4:00 p.m. of your intent to appear. Per California Rules of Court, rule 3.1308(a)(1), failure to do both items 1 and 2 will result in no oral argument. Note: Notifying CourtCall (the court’s telephonic appearance provider) of your intent to appear does not satisfy the requirement of notifying the court.

Case No. Title / Description

25CV-06755 Two Jinn, Inc. vs. Luis Mendoza, et al.

Order to Show Cause Why Sanctions Should Not Be Imposed on Plaintiff's Counsel for Failure to Attend Case Management Conference on June 5, 2026

Appearance required.

Case Management Conference

Appearance required.

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share