DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
20CV-02472·merced·Civil·Civil
Hearing 3 months agoGOOD CAUSE NOT to issue sanctions; GOOD CAUSE NOT to dismiss; Default prove-up dropped

Ramiro Ramos vs Javier Zambrano et al.

Order to Show Cause Re: Sanctions; Order to Show Cause Re: Dismissal

Hearing date
May 28, 2026
Department
8
Prevailing
Plaintiff
Appearance
Not required

Motion type

Browse all Other rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffRamiro Ramos
DefendantJavier Zambrano

Attorneys

Dennis Chinfor Plaintiff

Ruling

Hon. Stephanie L. Jamieson Courtroom 8

627 W. 21st Street, Merced

Thursday, May 28, 2026 8:15 a.m.

The following tentative rulings shall become the ruling of the court unless a party gives notice of intention to appear as follows: 1. You must call (209) 725-4240 to notify the court of your intent to appear.

2. You must give notice to all other parties before 4:00 p.m. of your intent to appear. Per California Rules of Court, rule 3.1308(a)(1), failure to do both items 1 and 2 will result in no oral argument. Note: Notifying CourtCall (the court’s telephonic appearance provider) of your intent to appear does not satisfy the requirement of notifying the court.

Case No. Title / Description

20CV-02472 Ramiro Ramos vs Javier Zambrano et al.

Order to Show Cause Re: Sanctions

Based on the declaration of counsel, Dennis Chin, filed May 5, 2026, the Court finds GOOD CAUSE NOT to issue sanctions. No appearance is required.

Order to Show Cause Re: Dismissal

Based on the declaration of counsel, Dennis Chin, filed May 5, 2026, the Court finds GOOD CAUSE NOT to dismiss the within action. No appearance is required.

Default Prove-Up Hearing

The default prove-up hearing is DROPPED FROM CALENDAR. The Court has reviewed the declarations submitted pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 585 in support of the request for default judgment and found the evidence sufficient for entry of judgment. The Court has signed the order for entry of judgment which will be processed by the clerk’s office.

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share