Bowie vs. NuEyes Technologies, Inc.

Case Management Conference Order to Show Cause re: Dismissal re: Default Judgment Order to Show Cause re: Dismissal for Failure to Serve 2 Bowie vs. NuEyes Technologies, Inc.

2025-01501793 Motion to Strike Answer

Off Calendar 3 Brainard vs. Brainard

2025-01499684 Motion to Compel Answers to Form Interrogatories Motion to Compel Answers to Special Interrogatories Motion to Compel Production Motion to Deem Facts Admitted

Defendant Bartley Thomas Brainard’s unopposed motions to compel responses from Plaintiff Bradley Alan Brainard to his form interrogatories, set one, special interrogatories, set one, and request for production of documents, set one, are granted. Plaintiff is ordered to serve verified responses without objection to Defendant’s discovery requests within 20 days of the notice of the ruling.

Defendant’s unopposed motion to deem facts admitted in response to his requests for admission propounded on Plaintiff is also granted.

On 12/17/25, Defendant electronically served Form Interrogatories, Special Interrogatories, Requests for Production and Requests for Admission on Plaintiff. (Sternad Decl., ¶¶ 3, 24; Exs. 1, 7.) Defendant followed with a letter informing Plaintiff that he would not be allowing any extensions. (Sternad Decl., ¶ 4, Ex. 2.) As of the date of the filing of this motion (1/29/26), Plaintiff had not served any responses. (Sternad Decl., ¶ 7.)

Plaintiff has not opposed these motions.

Because Defendant demonstrated that the discovery requests were served on Plaintiff, the deadline has passed, and no responses were served or have been served as of the date of the hearing, orders compelling responses and production and deeming the requests for admission admitted are appropriate. (See Code Civ. Proc., §§ 2030.290, 2031.300, 2033.280.)

The Court imposes monetary sanctions against Plaintiff in the amount of $860.00 per motion ($3,440.00 total) payable to Defendant and its