DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
CGC24619616·sf·Civil·Civil
Hearing 10 months agoOFF CALENDAR

MICHAEL NOLIN VS. DAVID KANG ET AL

DEMURRER to Amended COMPLAINT

Hearing date
Oct 10, 2025
Department
302
Prevailing
Plaintiff

Motion type

Browse all Demurrer rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffMICHAEL NOLIN
DefendantDAVID KANG
DefendantALICIA COTTA

Ruling

On the Law and Motion / Discovery calendar for October 10, 2025, line 12. 1 - DEFENDANT ALICIA COTTA, MISNAMED AS "ALICIA DARROW" DEMURRER to 1ST Amended COMPLAINT.

Defendant Alicia Cotta's Demurrer to Plaintiff Michael Nolin's First Amended Complaint is OFF CALENDAR.

A party demurring to a pleading must meet and confer with the party who filed the pleading "[b]efore filing [the] demurrer." (Code of Civil Procedure section 430.41 (a).) The meeting must be "in person, by telephone or by video conference." (Ibid.) The meeting must take place at least five days before the date the motion must be filed. (Code of Civil Procedure section 430.41(a)(2.) The moving party must file a declaration with its moving papers demonstrating compliance with these requirements and/or that the opposing party failed to confer in good faith. (Code of Civil Procedure section 430.41(3).)

Defendant's counsel here sent a letter to Plaintiff's counsel. (See Safron Decl. par. 3 and Ex. 2.) Defendant presented no evidence that counsel met be "in person, by telephone or by video conference." There is no evidence that counsel meaningfully tried to do so; inviting the other side to call in response to a letter is not conferring in person, by telephone or by videoconference. The parties' meet and confer duties are spelled out clearly and compliance is easy. Non-compliance here is not excused.

Defendants are granted 15 days leave to respond to the FAC. Defendant Cotta is ordered to prepare a proposed order which repeats verbatim the above text and email it to contestdept302tr@sftc.org prior to the time set for hearing.

For the 9:00 a.m. calendar, all attorneys and parties may appear in Department 302 remotely or in person. Remote hearings will be conducted by videoconference using Zoom. (Dept. 302 Zoom ID 160 409 7690; Passcode 516287.) To appear remotely at the hearing, go to the court's website at sfsuperiorcourt.org under "Online Services," navigate to "Tentative Rulings," and click on the appropriate link, or dial the corresponding phone number.

Any party who contests a tentative ruling must send an email to contestdept302tr@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties by 4pm stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests. The subject line of the email shall include the line number, case name and case number. The text of the email shall include the name and contact information, including email address, of the attorney or party who will appear at the hearing.

The court no longer provides a court reporter in the Law & Motion Department. Parties may retain their own reporter, who may appear in the courtroom or remotely. A retained reporter must be a California certified court reporter (CSR), for only a CSR's transcript may be used in California courts. If a CSR is being retained, include in your email all of the following: their name, CSR and telephone numbers, and their individual work email address. =(302/JMQ) | |

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share