DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
25CV466664·santaclara·Civil·Civil
Hearing 2 months agoOFF CALENDAR

JANE DOE vs PINHSI CHEN et al

Demurrer; Motion to Strike

Hearing date
Jun 12, 2026
Department
13
Prevailing
N/A
Appearance
Not required

Motion type

Browse all Demurrer rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffJANE DOE
DefendantPINHSI CHEN

Ruling

SUPERIOR COURT, STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA Department 13 Honorable Daniel T. Nishigaya R. Belligan, Courtroom Clerk 191 North First Street, San Jose, CA 95113 Telephone: 408-882-2240

DATE: June 12, 2026 TIME: 9:00 & 9:01 A.M. TO CONTEST A TENTATIVE RULING, YOU MUST CALL (408) 808-6856 BEFORE 4:00 P.M. ON THE DAY PRIOR TO THE HEARING. You must also inform all other sides to the issue before 4:00 P.M. the day prior to the hearing that you plan to contest the ruling. The Court will not hear argument, and the tentative ruling will be adopted if these notifications are not made. (Cal. Rule of Court 3.1308(a)(1); Civil Local Rule 8.D.)

LINE # CASE # CASE TITLE RULING LINE 1 24CV448687 ISJ General Trading, LLC vs Capital Motion: Judgment on Pleadings Asset Exchange and Trading, LLC Ctrl Click (or scroll down) on Line 1 for tentative ruling. LINE 2 24CV450955 Maria Lopez vs American Honda Motor Motion: Compel Deposition Co., Inc., a California corporation Ctrl Click (or scroll down) on Line 2 for tentative ruling. LINE 3 25CV465834 DALI CHAIA vs GENESIS MOTOR Hearing: Petition Compel Arbitration AMERICA et al Ctrl Click (or scroll down) on Line 3 for tentative ruling. LINE 4 25CV466664 JANE DOE vs PINHSI CHEN et al Hearing: Demurrer

OFF CALENDAR due to the filing of a First Amended Complaint on June 1, 2026. LINE 5 25CV466664 JANE DOE vs PINHSI CHEN et al Motion: Strike

OFF CALENDAR due to the filing of a First Amended Complaint on June 1, 2026. LINE 6 25CV469397 RAFAEL HERRERA vs FCA US LLC Motion: Sanctions

Ctrl Click (or scroll down) on Line 6 for tentative ruling.

2

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share