All judges
Unstated
3 counties · 11 rulings ingested
Ruling distribution
11
rulings
Granted36%
Denied18%
Continued0%
Other45%
Prevailing party
8
determined
Plaintiff25%
Defendant38%
Mixed38%
At a glance
Grant rate36%
Denial rate18%
Continuance rate0%
First seenAug 1, 2023
Most recentAug 27, 2026
Motion type breakdown
Other
4
Demurrer
4
Motion for Reconsideration
2
Petition
1
Motion to Quash
1
Granted
Denied
Continued
Other
Recent rulings
| Case | County | Motion | Ruling | Indexed | Hearing |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
24TRCP00102 Friedman v. Troia | la Civil | Motion for Order: Reconsideration of VL-110; Motion to Set Aside VL-120 Denial; Motion to Re-Open | DENIED | Aug 27, 2026 | Aug 27, 2026 |
25CV016631 GARCIA, et al. vs INTEGRITY AUTO SALES INC, et al. | sacramento Civil | Motion to Set Aside/Vacate Default (CCP 473.5) | GRANTED | Aug 24, 2026 | Aug 24, 2026 |
24STCP03892 Moises E. Cruz v. Santa Maura Spice and Garlic Co., Inc., et al. | la Civil | Motion to Quash Respondent Santa Maura Spice and Garlic Co., Inc.'s Deposition Subpoena for Production of Business Records Issued to Bank of America, N.A.; Motion to Quash Respondent Santa Maura Spice and Garlic Co., Inc.'s Deposition Subpoena for Production of Business Records Issued to Frost Bank | GRANTED in Part and DENIED in Part. Sanctions denied. | Aug 20, 2026 | Aug 20, 2026 |
25CV019484 PEREZ vs SCHAAL, et al. | sacramento Civil | Demurrer to Plaintiff’s First Amended Complaint | SUSTAINED as to fraud; OVERRULED as to intentional interference with economic relationship and intentional infliction of emotional distress. | Aug 18, 2026 | Aug 18, 2026 |
26STCP02483 VIVEK SHAH v. STARTENGINE CROWDFUNDING, INC., et al. | la Civil | Petitioner Vivek Shah's Petition to Compel Arbitration | GRANTED in part and DENIED in part | Aug 14, 2026 | Aug 17, 2026 |
25STCV19509 FELIPE MADRIGAL LEON v. GENERAL MOTORS, LLC | la Civil | Defendant General Motors' Demurrer to the First Amended Complaint | SUSTAINED without leave to amend | Aug 14, 2026 | Aug 17, 2026 |
25STCV36330 WILLIAM LYNG v. THE BOEING COMPANY, et al. | la Civil | Defendant The Boeing Company's Demurrer to the Second Amended Complaint | OVERRULED | Aug 14, 2026 | Aug 17, 2026 |
CVL60863 United of Omaha Life Ins. Co. v. Pereira et al | tuolumne Civil | Motion to Disburse Funds | Continue for POS | Aug 26, 2026 | Aug 14, 2026 |
23CV004130 YOUNG, et al. vs AALGAARD, et al. | sacramento Civil | Motion for Order Setting Aside and Vacating Dismissal | GRANTED in part; dismissals set aside as to Young and the entire complaint; ancillary relief requests DENIED. | Jun 4, 2026 | Jun 3, 2026 |
34-2023-00333705-CU-BC-GDS Naeim Zamani Mahfroujaki, individually, and as a derivative action vs. Zoom, Inc., a California corporation | sacramento Civil | Motion for Reconsideration | DENIED | Jun 17, 2026 | Feb 29, 2024 |
34-2022-00328643-CU-OE-GDS Vanessa Singh vs. State of California, Department of General Services | sacramento Civil | Demurrer | Demurrer overruled as to First Cause of Action; sustained with leave to amend as to Fourth Cause of Action. | Aug 7, 2026 | Aug 1, 2023 |
Frequently asked questions
What is Judge Unstated's grant rate in California Superior Court?+
Based on 11 tentative rulings indexed by DecisionDepot, Judge Unstated has a 36% grant rate (18% denial rate, 0% continued). Counties active: LA, SACRAMENTO, TUOLUMNE.
What kinds of motions does Judge Unstated hear most often?+
The most common motion type in Judge Unstated's indexed rulings is Other. The full motion-type breakdown appears on this page — each motion type shows grant, denial, and continuance counts so practitioners can prepare accordingly.