Dao vs. Boyd
Demurrer to the Complaint
Motion type
Parties
Ruling
15 30-2026-01569773 The Court has read and considered the Defendant’s Demurrer to the Bridge WF Ca Crystal Complaint (ROA 11) and the Complaint (ROA 2). View LP vs. Gomez The Court OVERRULES the Demurrer.
The Court takes Judicial Notice that the Defendant filed an Answer to the Complaint (ROA 20) on May 29, 2026.
Plaintiff is ordered to give notice.
16 30-2026-01567419 The Court has read and considered the Defendant’s Demurrer to the Dao vs. Boyd Complaint (ROA 9), the Complaint (ROA 1), and the Plaintiff’s Opposition to the Demurrer.
The Court OVERRULES the Demurrer.
The Defendant is to file an Answer within 5 calendar days.
Cited authorities
Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities
Ask about this ruling
Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”