Ridgewood Village L.P. vs. Vazquez
Demurrer to the Complaint
Motion type
Parties
Ruling
Plaintiff leave to amend to attach the documents properly with the Complaint. If the Plaintiff served the Notice to Permanently Perform Covenant or Quit as shown in the Complaint, the Demurrer will be sustained without leave to amend, as the law does not permit the Plaintiff to amend a defective notice to pay or quit.
12 30-2026-01558581 The Court has reviewed the Court docket, including Demurrer to Complaint Far West South Coast, (ROA 29) filed on 5/18/26, Request for Clerk’s Default Judgment (ROA 32) Ltd. vs. Platek filed 5/19/26, Application for Writ of Possession (ROA 33), Writ of Possession (ROA 34), and Judgment – Unlawful Detainer (ROA 35).
Court takes Judicial Notice of the 5/6/2026 Minute Order (ROA 27) and Notice of Ruling (ROA 26).
The Court Clerk’s Office entered a Default against Defendant Mark Platek in error on 5/19/2026. The Court vacates the Default entered on 5/19/2026 and the Judgment of 5/20/2026. The Court QUASHES the Writ of Possession.
The Court Clerk is to notify the Orange County Sheriff’s Department forthwith that the Writ is QUASHED and the lockout CANCELLED.
The Court has read and considered the Defendant’s Demurrer to the Complaint (ROA 29) and the Complaint (ROA 2).
The Court OVERRULES the Demurrer.
The Defendant is ordered to file an answer within 5 calendar days.
Plaintiff is ordered to serve notice of the Court’s ruling.
13 30-2026-01567335 The Court has read and considered the Defendant’s Demurrer to the Ridgewood Village Complaint (ROA 7), Plaintiff’s Opposition, and the Complaint (ROA 2). L.P. vs. Vazquez The Court OVERRULES the Demurrer.
The Defendant is ordered to file an answer within 5 calendar days.
Plaintiff is ordered to serve notice of the Court’s ruling. 14 30-2026-01558051 The Court has read and considered the Defendant’s Demurrer to the Daibo, LLC vs. Complaint (ROA 13) and the Complaint (ROA 2). Mungia The Court OVERRULES the Demurrer.
The Defendant is ordered to file an answer within 5 calendar days.
Plaintiff is ordered to serve notice of the Court’s ruling.
Cited authorities
Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities
Ask about this ruling
Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”