All cases
25CV004770·sacramento·Civil·CivilHearing 3 months agoThe Court is satisfied that Plaintiff has adequately addressed the Court’s concerns. The Court will sign the revised Proposed Order.
BROOKS, et al. vs ATLAS DISPOSAL INDUSTRIES, LLC, et al.
Status Conference (Compliance Hearing)
Hearing date
Jun 5, 2026
Department
8B
Judge
—
Prevailing
Plaintiff
Appearance
Not required
Motion type
Parties
PlaintiffBROOKS
DefendantATLAS DISPOSAL INDUSTRIES, LLC
Ruling
25CV004770: BROOKS, et al. vs ATLAS DISPOSAL INDUSTRIES, LLC, et al. 06/05/2026 Status Conference (Compliance Hearing) in Department 8B
Tentative Ruling
NO APPEARANCE REQUIRED.
The Court is satisfied that Plaintiff has adequately addressed the Court's concerns. The Court will sign the revised Proposed Order.
Cited authorities
Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.
Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities
Ask about this ruling
Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”
Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.