DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
24CV018816·sacramento·Civil·Civil
Hearing todayThe Court is satisfied that Plaintiff has adequately addressed the Court’s concerns. The court will sign the [Proposed] Order.

CASTON vs NORTH VALLEY, LLC, et al.

Status Conference (Compliance Hearing)

Hearing date
Aug 21, 2026
Department
8B
Judge
Prevailing
Plaintiff

Motion type

Browse all Other rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffCASTON
DefendantNORTH VALLEY, LLC

Ruling

24CV018816: CASTON vs NORTH VALLEY, LLC, et al. 08/21/2026 Status Conference (Compliance Hearing) in Department 8B

Tentative Ruling

The Court is satisfied that Plaintiff has adequately addressed the Court's concerns. The court will sign the [Proposed] Order.

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share