All cases
25CV003872·sacramento·Civil·CivilHearing 3 months agoThe Court is satisfied that Plaintiff has adequately addressed the Court’s concerns. The Court will sign the Proposed Order, noting the revised Notice attached to the Joint Supplemental Brief.
LEON vs DIAGNOSTIC PATHOLOGY MEDICAL GROUP, INC., et al.
Status Conference (Compliance Hearing)
Hearing date
May 22, 2026
Department
8B
Judge
—
Prevailing
Plaintiff
Appearance
Not required
Motion type
Parties
PlaintiffEmily Leon
Plaintiffand on behalf of all similarly situated individuals
DefendantDiagnostic Pathology Medical Group, Inc.
Attorneys
Elliot J. Siegelfor Emily Leon
Elliot J. Siegelfor and on behalf of all similarly situated individuals
JAI KIMfor Diagnostic Pathology Medical Group, Inc.
Ruling
25CV003872: LEON vs DIAGNOSTIC PATHOLOGY MEDICAL GROUP, INC., et al. 05/22/2026 Status Conference (Compliance Hearing) in Department 8B
Tentative Ruling
NO APPEARANCE REQUIRED.
The Court is satisfied that Plaintiff has adequately addressed the Court's concerns. The Court will sign the Proposed Order, noting the revised Notice attached to the Joint Supplemental Brief.
Cited authorities
Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.
Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities
Ask about this ruling
Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”
Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.