DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
2024CUWT033072·ventura·Civil·Employment
Hearing 3 months agoGRANTED in part

DULCE SOFIA GONZALEZ FLORES vs DIVERSIFIED RESTAURANT GROUP LLC, et al.

Plaintiff’s Motion to Quash Defendant’s School Records Subpoenas; Plaintiff’s Motion to Quash Defendant’s School Records Subpoena to Simi Valley Unified School District

Hearing date
May 29, 2026
Department
42
Judge
Prevailing
Mixed

Motion type

Browse all Motion to Quash rulings statewide →

Monetary amounts referenced

$2,760

Parties

PlaintiffDULCE SOFIA GONZALEZ FLORES
DefendantDIVERSIFIED RESTAURANT GROUP LLC

Ruling

2024CUWT033072: DULCE SOFIA GONZALEZ FLORES vs DIVERSIFIED RESTAURANT GROUP LLC, et al. 05/29/2026 in Department 42 Motion to Quash Defendant's School Record Subpoenas

Motions: 1) Plaintiff’s Motion to Quash Defendant’s School Records Subpoenas (opposed) 2) Plaintiff’s Motion to Quash Defendant’s School Records Subpoena to Simi Valley Unified School District, request for sanctions of $2,760 (opposed) Tentative Rulings:

The Court GRANTS Plaintiff’s two Motions to Quash in part, limiting each of the subpoenas’ requests to official and unofficial transcripts for high school years, a copy of the relevant work permit, and any records specifically from the work-experience class, (i.e., weekly reports submitted to the supervising teacher). The parties shall meet and confer regarding an appropriate protective order, to be drafted by the parties.

In balancing Plaintiff’s privacy interests in her school records against the Defendants’ need for the discovery, the Court considers the practical consequences of the requested disclosure of Plaintiff’s records, which is relatively modest. Any intrusion on Plaintiff’s privacy rights is minimal, particularly if records are produced subject to a protective order. At the same time, Defendant’s stated need for the bulk of the discovery requested is non-existent or not particularly compelling. The limitations set forth above strike an appropriate balance.

The Court denies sanctions given the mixed result.

Moving party to give notice.

1

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share