DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
CUD26682040·sf·Civil·Real Property / Housing
Hearing 3 months agoOVERRULED

KEVIN HUE ET AL VS. JINGMIN MAI ET AL

DEMURRER to COMPLAINT

Hearing date
May 28, 2026
Department
501
Prevailing
Plaintiff

Motion type

Browse all Demurrer rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffKEVIN HUE
DefendantJINGMIN MAI
DefendantXILIN MAI
DefendantHUIMING LIANG
DefendantYALI WU

Ruling

Real Property/Housing Court Law and Motion Calendar for May 28, 2026. Line 14. DEFENDANT JINGMIN MAI, XILIN MAI, HUIMING LIANG, YALI WU DEMURRER to COMPLAINT is OVERRULED. Plaintiffs' Notice of Termination and Notice of Delivery complied with requirements per the San Francisco Rent Ordinance. Plaintiff's Notice of Termination is sufficient pursuant to San Francisco Rent Ordinance 37.9A(f)(3) and 37.9A(e)(1)(c) in terms of providing adequate notice and information of Defendants' rights to extend the 120-day period to one year and relocation payments. =(501/DWH) Parties may appear in-person, telephonically or via Zoom (Video - Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849; or Phone Dial in: (669) 254-5252; Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849).

Parties who intend to appear at the hearing must give notice to opposing parties and the court promptly, but no later than 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing unless the tentative ruling has specified that a hearing is required. Notice of contesting a tentative ruling shall be provided by sending an email to the court to Department501ContestTR@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests. A party may not argue at the hearing if the opposing party is not so notified, and the opposing party does not appear. | |

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share