DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
CGC25631277·sf·Civil·Real Property/Housing
Hearing about 2 months agoSUSTAINED

CUONG VAN DUONG ET AL VS. MARY TRAN ET AL

DEMURRER to COMPLAINT

Hearing date
Jul 9, 2026
Department
501
Prevailing
Defendant

Motion type

Browse all Demurrer rulings statewide →

Causes of action

Parties

PlaintiffCUONG VAN DUONG
DefendantMARY TRAN

Ruling

SF Superior Court - Real Property / Housing Dept 501 - CGC25631277 - July 9, 2026 Hearing date: July 9, 2026 Case number: CGC25631277 Case title: CUONG VAN DUONG ET AL VS. MARY TRAN ET AL Case Number: | | CGC25631277 | Case Title: | | CUONG VAN DUONG ET AL VS. MARY TRAN ET AL | Court Date: | | 2026-07-09 09:30 AM | Calendar Matter: | | DEMURRER to COMPLAINT | Rulings: | | Real Property/Housing Court Law and Motion Calendar for July 9, 2026. Line 2.1.

DEFENDANT MARY TRAN AN INDIVIDUAL DEMURRER to COMPLAINT is SUSTAINED.

Demurrer to the causes of action for Violation of California Financial Code 22750 Quasi-contract for Restitution Based Upon Unjust Enrichment is SUSTAINED with leave to amend for Plaintiffs to allege in good faith that the loans at issue in this complaint (631277) were obtained primarily for "personal, family, or household use."

Demurrer based on uncertainty is SUSTAINED with leave to amend to properly sequentially number the paragraphs.

Demurrer to the causes of action for Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress and Declaratory Relief is SUSTAINED without leave to amend.

No opposition made in the filed opposition papers. =(501/CFH)

Parties may appear in-person, telephonically or via Zoom (Video - Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849; or Phone Dial in: (669) 254-5252; Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849).

Parties who intend to appear at the hearing must give notice to opposing parties and the court promptly, but no later than 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing unless the tentative ruling has specified that a hearing is required.

Notice of contesting a tentative ruling shall be provided by sending an email to the court to Department501ContestTR@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests.

A party may not argue at the hearing if the opposing party is not notified, and the opposing party does not appear. | |

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share