DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
CUD25678754·sf·Civil·Real Property / Housing
Hearing about 1 year agoSUSTAINED WITHOUT LEAVE TO AMEND

MIN HWA MAC VS. ZHI-JIAN LIANG ET AL

DEMURRER to COMPLAINT

Hearing date
Jul 23, 2025
Department
501
Judge
Prevailing
Defendant

Motion type

Browse all Demurrer rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffMIN HWA MAC
DefendantZHI-JIAN LIANG

Ruling

SF Superior Court - Real Property / Housing Dept 501 - CUD25678754 - July 23, 2025 Hearing date: July 23, 2025 Case number: CUD25678754 Case title: MIN HWA MAC VS. ZHI-JIAN LIANG ET AL Case Number: | | CUD25678754 | Case Title: | | MIN HWA MAC VS. ZHI-JIAN LIANG ET AL | Court Date: | | 2025-07-23 09:30 AM | Calendar Matter: | | DEMURRER to COMPLAINT | Rulings: | | Real Property/Housing Court Law and Motion calendar for July 23, 2025, line 12.

Defendant's Demurrer to Complaint is SUSTAINED WITHOUT LEAVE TO AMEND. The Notice of Termination of Tenancy is fatally defective, because it provides an inaccurate description of the tenants' rights under SFRO 37.9(j). While the full text of this section is attached to the Notice, the language of the Notice itself is inconsistent with that of the attachment. A tenant cannot reasonably be expected to understand that the language in the attachment, and not that in the Notice itself, in fact provides the accurate information. (2710 Sutter Ventures, LLC v. Millis (2022) 82 Cal.App.5th 842, 863.) =(501/VMH)

Parties may appear in-person, telephonically or via Zoom (Video - Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849; or Phone Dial in: (669) 254-5252; Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849).

Parties who intend to appear at the hearing must give notice to opposing parties and the court promptly, but no later than 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing unless the tentative ruling has specified that a hearing is required.

Notice of contesting a tent ative ruling shall be provided by sending an email to the court to Department501ContestTR@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests. A party may not argue at the hearing if the opposing party is not so notified and the opposing party does not appear. | |

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share