DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
25-01458566·orange·Civil·Civil
Hearing 3 months agoGRANTED

Toppan Merrill LLC vs. Mobix Labs, Inc.

Motion to Correct Clerical Error

Hearing date
May 26, 2026
Department
C25
Prevailing
Moving Party

Motion type

Browse all Other rulings statewide →

Monetary amounts referenced

$315,036.70$315,564.70

Parties

PlaintiffToppan Merrill LLC
DefendantMobix Labs, Inc.

Ruling

Plaintiff to give notice. 108 Toppan Merrill LLC vs. Mobix Labs, Inc.

25-01458566 Motion to Correct Clerical Error Plaintiff Toppan Merrill LLC’s unopposed Motion to Correct Clerical Error is GRANTED. It appears to the Court that there is a clerical mistake in the judgment entered on 5/20/25, in that the Line 6 of Paragraph 6(a) incorrectly indicates that “Total” damages are $315,036.70. This number is the result of a mathematical error, as it does not correctly reflect the total of the three individual components of damage set forth in Paragraph 6 of the judgment. The total is $315,564.70. Accordingly, pursuant to CCP §473(d), the Court will sign Plaintiff’s proposed Amended Judgment, which is attached as Exhibit C to the moving papers. The Amended Judgment corrects line 6 of Paragraph 6(a) to reflect the total damages of $315,564.70. Clerk to give notice

109 Hernandez vs. Montage Laguna Beach, LLC

25-01521170 Motion to Compel Arbitration Defendants Montage Laguna Beach, LLC, Sebastian French, Jennifer Beaumont, and Lucia Arcadia (“Defendants”) move to compel arbitration and stay the case pending arbitration. Plaintiff Armanda Millicent Hernandez (“Plaintiff”) opposed the motion. The Motion is DENIED. “In 2022, Congress amended the FAA by adopting the EFAA.” (Doe v. Second Street Corp. (2024) 105 Cal.App.5th 552, 564.) “By its terms, the EFAA applies ‘with respect to any dispute or claim that arises or accrues on or after the

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share