MULLEN v. CRAZY BAKERY, LLC
Motion to Correct Clerical Errors Nunc Pro Tunc
Motion type
Parties
Ruling
LAW AND MOTION CALENDAR AUGUST 21, 2026
2. MULLEN v. CRAZY BAKERY, LLC, 23CV1030
Motion to Correct Clerical Errors Nunc Pro Tunc
TENTATIVE RULING # 2: ABSENT OBJECTION, MOTION GRANTED AS REQUESTED. THE
JUDGMENT ENTERED IN THIS CASE ON JUNE 27, 2023, AND THE ACKNOWLEDGMENT
OF PARTIAL SATISFACTION OF JUDGMENT FILED ON MARCH 4, 2024, SHALL BOTH
INSERT THE CORRECT NAME OF THE DEFENDANT, “CRAZY GOOD BAKERY AND CAFE,
LLC” IN PLACE OF “CRAZY BAKERY, LLC.” THIS ORDER IS AN ORDER NUNC PRO TUNC.
NO HEARING ON THIS MATTER WILL BE HELD (LEWIS v. SUPERIOR COURT (1999) 19
CAL.4TH 1232, 1247), UNLESS A NOTICE OF INTENT TO APPEAR AND REQUEST FOR
ORAL ARGUMENT IS TRANSMITTED ELECTRONICALLY THROUGH THE COURT’S
WEBSITE OR BY TELEPHONE TO THE COURT AT (530) 573-3042 BY 4:00 P.M. ON THE
DAY THE TENTATIVE RULING IS ISSUED. NOTICE TO ALL PARTIES OF AN INTENT TO
APPEAR MUST BE MADE BY TELEPHONE OR IN PERSON. PROOF OF SERVICE OF SAID
NOTICE MUST BE FILED PRIOR TO OR AT THE HEARING.
Cited authorities
Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities
Ask about this ruling
Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”