Motion to correct clerical error in judgment nunc pro tunc
he brought the instant motion for leave to file the cross-complaint after he “organized the relevant facts and legal basis for my claims.”
The court continues the 8/3/26 CMC to 11/16/26 at 8:45am in Dept. C24.
Defendant shall give notice.
307 Credit Line The motion of plaintiff Credit Line Capital Group, Capital Group, Inc., for an order correcting a clerical error in the Inc. vs. Liu judgment entered on April 9, 2026 nunc pro tunc is GRANTED IN PART.
The court checks the box under 5(a) indicating that defendants’ names are continued on attachment 5a. The court also strikes attachment 6a and any reference thereto.
The clerk shall give notice.
308 Christiansen vs. The motion for entry of stipulated judgment filed by Arellano defendant/cross-complainant Breanna Arellano (Arellano) against plaintiff/cross-defendant James Christiansen and cross-defendant Speak Easy Social Club, LLC (collectively, Cross-Defendants) is DENIED.
Cross-Defendants’ evidentiary objections are OVERRULED. As to Arellano’s evidentiary objections, the cited testimony and objections are not relevant to the disposition of the motion. The court thus declines to rule on the objections.
Arellano relies on Code of Civil Procedure sections 664.6 and 187, and Rooney v. Vermont Investment Corp. (1973) 10 Cal.3d 351, in support of her request for entry of judgment.
The summary procedure of Code of Civil Procedure section 664.6 (Section 664.6) to obtain judgment can
Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities
Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”