DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
25CV003872·sacramento·Civil·Case Management Conference
Hearing 10 months agoThe Court sets a further CMC.

LEON vs DIAGNOSTIC PATHOLOGY MEDICAL GROUP, INC., et al.

Case Management Conference

Hearing date
Nov 7, 2025
Department
22
Judge
Prevailing
N/A
Next hearing
Dec 19, 2025
Appearance
Not required

Motion type

Browse all Other rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffEmily Leon
Plaintiffand on behalf of all similarly situated individuals
DefendantDiagnostic Pathology Medical Group, Inc.

Attorneys

Elliot J. Siegelfor Emily Leon
Elliot J. Siegelfor and on behalf of all similarly situated individuals
JAI KIMfor Diagnostic Pathology Medical Group, Inc.

Ruling

25CV003872: LEON vs DIAGNOSTIC PATHOLOGY MEDICAL GROUP, INC., et al. 11/07/2025 Case Management Conference in Department 22

Tentative Ruling

NO APPEARANCE REQUIRED. The Court sets a further CMC as set forth below.

The parties shall file and email a Joint Case Management Statement to the department no later than 15 calendar days before the next CMC.

Please check your tentative ruling before the next Court date at www.saccourt.ca.gov.

Please note that the Complex Civil Case Department now provides information to assist you in managing your complex case on the Court website at https://www.saccourt.ca.gov/civil/complex-civil-cases.aspx. The Court strongly encourages parties to review this website regularly to stay abreast of the most recent complex civil case procedures. Please refer to the website before directly contacting the Court Clerk for information.

FURTHER CONFERENCE A Case Management Conference is scheduled for 12/19/2025 at 10:30 AM in Department 22.

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share