All cases
CVPS2602292·riverside·Probate·Petition to reduce affirmative votesHearing 3 months agoNo tentative ruling. The petition does not comply with Local Rule 3316C. Parties wishing to argue the petition are ordered to appear.
SADDLEBACK OWNERS ASSOCIATION VS SADDLEBACK OWNERS ASSOCIATION
HEARING ON PETITION TO REDUCE PERCENTAGE OF AFFIRMATIVE VOTES NECESSARY TO AMEND A DECLARATION OF COVENANTS
Hearing date
May 21, 2026
Department
PS4
Judge
—
Prevailing
N/A
Motion type
Parties
PlaintiffSADDLEBACK OWNERS ASSOCIATION
DefendantSADDLEBACK OWNERS ASSOCIATION
Ruling
1. CASE # CASE NAME HEARING NAME SADDLEBACK OWNERS HEARING ON PETITION TO REDUCE ASSOCIATION VS PERCENTAGE OF AFFIRMATIVE
SADDLEBACK OWNERS VOTES NECESSARY TO AMEND A ASSOCIATION DECLARATION OF COVENANTS Tentative Ruling: No tentative ruling. The petition does not comply with Local Rule 3316C. Parties wishing to argue the petition are ordered to appear. Appearance may be telephonic.
Cited authorities
Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.
Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities
Ask about this ruling
Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”
Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.