SADDLEBACK OWNERS ASSOCIATION VS SADDLEBACK OWNERS ASSOCIATION
Case Information
Hearing date: May 21, 2026
Department: PS4
Judge: —
Prevailing party: N/A
Ruling: No tentative ruling. The petition does not comply with Local Rule 3316C. Parties wishing to argue the petition are ordered to appear.
Appearance: Required
Case type: Petition to reduce affirmative votes
Motion(s)
HEARING ON PETITION TO REDUCE PERCENTAGE OF AFFIRMATIVE VOTES NECESSARY TO AMEND A DECLARATION OF COVENANTS
Motion Type Tags
Petition
Parties
- Plaintiff: SADDLEBACK OWNERS ASSOCIATION
- Defendant: SADDLEBACK OWNERS ASSOCIATION
Ruling
1. CASE # CASE NAME HEARING NAME SADDLEBACK OWNERS HEARING ON PETITION TO REDUCE ASSOCIATION VS PERCENTAGE OF AFFIRMATIVE
SADDLEBACK OWNERS VOTES NECESSARY TO AMEND A ASSOCIATION DECLARATION OF COVENANTS Tentative Ruling: No tentative ruling. The petition does not comply with Local Rule 3316C. Parties wishing to argue the petition are ordered to appear. Appearance may be telephonic.