DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
CVPS2602272·riverside·Probate·Contract
Hearing 3 months agoNo tentative ruling. The motion does not comply with Local Rule 3316C. Parties wishing to argue the motion are ordered to appear.

CAPITAL ONE, N.A., SUCCESSOR BY MERGER TO DISCOVER BANK VS DICINI

MOTION TO COMPEL ARBITRATION AND STAY PROCEEDINGS

Hearing date
Jun 10, 2026
Department
PS4
Judge
Prevailing
N/A

Motion type

Browse all Other rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffCAPITAL ONE, N.A., SUCCESSOR BY MERGER TO DISCOVER BANK
DefendantDICINI

Ruling

4. CASE # CASE NAME HEARING NAME CAPITAL ONE, N.A., DEFENDANT'S NOTICE OF MOTION SUCCESSOR BY MERGER AND MOTION TO COMPEL

TO DISCOVER BANK VS ARBITRATION AND STAY DICINI PROCEEDINGS Tentative Ruling: No tentative ruling. The motion does not comply with Local Rule 3316C. Parties wishing to argue the motion are ordered to appear. Appearance may be telephonic.

5. CASE # CASE NAME HEARING NAME HEARING ON PETITION FOR ORDER RELIEVING PETITIONER FROM ROGERS VS COUNTY OF CVPS2602782 GOVERNMENT CLAIMS ACT RIVERSIDE REQUIREMENTS (GOV. CODE SECTION 946.6) Tentative Ruling: The petition for relief from Government Claims Act requirements filed by Wanda Denise Rogers is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. There is no indication petitioner has served respondents the County of Riverside and the Riverside County Department of Social Services with copies of the petition.

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share