| Case | County / Judge | Motion | Ruling | Indexed | Hearing |
|---|
Motion For Entry Of Judgment For Possession And Monetary Damages Pursuant To Stipulation; Declarations In Support Thereof; [Proposed] Order; [Proposed] Judgment
SF Superior Court - Real Property / Housing Dept 501 - CUD24675548 - July 14, 2025 Hearing date: July 14, 2025 Case number: CUD24675548 Case title: HYDE PARK APARTMENTS, LLC VS. FRANCISCO JEREZ ET AL Case Number: | | CUD24675548 | Case Title: | | HYDE PARK APARTMENTS, LLC VS. FRANCISCO JEREZ ET AL | Court Date: | | 2025-07-14 09:30 AM | Calendar Matter: | | Motion For Entry Of Judgment For Possession And Monetary Damages Pursuant To Stipulation; Declarations In Support Thereof; [Proposed] Order; [Proposed] Judgment | Rulings: | | Real Property/Housing Court Law and Motion calendar for July 14, 2025, line 4.
Plaintiff's Motion Entry of Judgment for Possession and Monetary Damages Pursuant to Stipulation is OFF CALENDAR. Proof of service indicates notice was given only to an attorney who is not defendant's attorney of record in this action. Defendant is in pro per and as such, must be served with notice directly. =(501/CFH)
Parties may appear in-person, telephonically or via Zoom (Video - Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849; or Phone Dial in: (669) 254-5252; Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849).
Parties who intend to appear at the hearing must give notice to opposing parties and the court promptly, but no later than 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing unless the tentative ruling has specified that a hearing is required.
Notice of contesting a tent ative ruling shall be provided by sending an email to the court to Department501ContestTR@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests. A party may not argue at the hearing if the opposing party is not so notified and the opposing party does not appear. | |
Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities
Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”