DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
CGC24617566·sf·Civil·Real Property
Hearing about 1 year agoGRANTED

CLARENCE VINCENT TOWNSEND JR. ET AL VS. MELVIN WASHINGTON ET AL

MOTION TO STRIKE AMENDED COMPLAINT

Hearing date
Jul 3, 2025
Department
501
Prevailing
Defendant

Motion type

Browse all Motion to Strike rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffCLARENCE VINCENT TOWNSEND JR.
DefendantMELVIN WASHINGTON

Ruling

SF Superior Court - Real Property / Housing Dept 501 - CGC24617566 - July 3, 2025 Hearing date: July 3, 2025 Case number: CGC24617566 Case title: CLARENCE VINCENT TOWNSEND JR. ET AL VS. MELVIN WASHINGTON ET AL Case Number: | | CGC24617566 | Case Title: | | CLARENCE VINCENT TOWNSEND JR. ET AL VS. MELVIN WASHINGTON ET AL | Court Date: | | 2025-07-03 09:30 AM | Calendar Matter: | | MOTION TO STRIKE Amended COMPLAINT | Rulings: | | Real Property/Housing Court Law and Motion Calendar for July 3, 2025 line 3.

DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO STRIKE AMENDED COMPLAINT is GRANTED. The Court did not grant Plaintiff leave to amend paragraph 22 of the Complaint to add "through Mr. Rosen," so this amendment is stricken. Consistent with the Court's March 6, 2025 order, the remaining allegations listed in Defendant's Notice of Motion are stricken only to the extent that Plaintiff's first cause of action relies on those allegations to state a claim for relief. =(501/CFH)

Parties may appear in-person, telephonically or via Zoom [Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849; Phone Dial in: (669) 254-5252]. Parties who intend to appear at the hearing must give notice to opposing parties and the court promptly, but no later than 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing unless the tentative ruling has specified that a hearing is required.

Notice of contesting a tentative ruling shall be provided by sending an email to the court to Department501ContestTR@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests. A party may not argue at the hearing if the opposing party is not so notified and the opposing party does not appear. | |

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share