DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
CGC25631748·sf·Civil·Real Property
Hearing 5 months agoGRANTED

KAREN MOY VS. MILESTONE FINANCIAL, LLC ET AL

MOTION TO STRIKE COMPLAINT

Hearing date
Mar 23, 2026
Department
501
Prevailing
Moving Party

Motion type

Browse all Motion to Strike rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffKAREN MOY
DefendantMILESTONE FINANCIAL, LLC DBA MERS HOLDING LTD
DefendantWILLIAM STUART

Ruling

SF Superior Court - Real Property / Housing Dept 501 - CGC25631748 - March 23, 2026 Hearing date: March 23, 2026 Case number: CGC25631748 Case title: KAREN MOY VS. MILESTONE FINANCIAL, LLC ET AL Case Number: | | CGC25631748 | Case Title: | | KAREN MOY VS. MILESTONE FINANCIAL, LLC ET AL | Court Date: | | 2026-03-23 09:30 AM | Calendar Matter: | | MOTION TO STRIKE COMPLAINT | Rulings: | | Real Property/Housing Court Law and Motion Calendar for March 23, 2026. Line 1.3.

DEFENDANT MILESTONE FINANCIAL, LLC DBA MERS HOLDING LTD, WILLIAM STUART MOTION TO STRIKE COMPLAINT is GRANTED. Paragraphs 2, 34, and 35, as well as subheading E immediately preceding Paragraph 34, are stricken from the Complaint in their entirety. Plaintiff's Notice of Non-Opposition, although seemingly qualified, neither identifies any specific segments of the challenged portions which should not be stricken, nor provides any explanation or justification. =(501/CFH)

Parties may appear in-person, telephonically or via Zoom (Video - Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849; or Phone Dial in: (669) 254-5252; Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849).

Parties who intend to appear at the hearing must give notice to opposing parties and the court promptly, but no later than 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing unless the tentative ruling has specified that a hearing is required.

Notice of contesting a tentative ruling shall be provided by sending an email to the court to Department501ContestTR@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests. A party may not argue at the hearing if the opposing party is not notified, and the opposing party does not appear. | |

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share