DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
CGC24277244·sf·Civil·Asbestos Litigation
Hearing about 1 year agoA hearing is required.

ANGELA MEISENHEIMER ET AL VS. AMCORD, INC. ET AL

MOTION FOR WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY OF RECORD

Hearing date
Jul 8, 2025
Department
304
Judge
Prevailing
N/A

Motion type

Browse all Other rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffANGELA MEISENHEIMER
PlaintiffFRANK RUSSO III
PlaintiffSUSANNE SLOSS
OtherFRANK RUSSO II
DefendantAMCORD, INC.

Attorneys

Nancy T. Williams(Brayton Purcell LLP)for Plaintiff

Ruling

SF Superior Court - Asbestos Law & Motion - CGC24277244 - July 8, 2025 Hearing date: July 8, 2025 Case number: CGC24277244 Case title: ANGELA MEISENHEIMER ET AL VS. AMCORD, INC. ET AL Case Number: | | CGC24277244 | Case Title: | | ANGELA MEISENHEIMER ET AL VS. AMCORD, INC. ET AL | Court Date: | | 2025-07-08 09:00 AM | Calendar Matter: | | MOTION FOR WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY OF RECORD | Rulings: | | On Asbestos Law and Motion Calendar for Tuesday, July 8, 2025, in Department 304, Line 3.

Nancy T. Williams, Esq., of Brayton Purcell LLP filed a Motion to be Relieved as Counsel for Plaintiffs Frank Russo III and Susanne Sloss, as wrongful death hairs of Frank Russo II, deceased. This matter was continued from May 13, 2025, to July 8, 2025.

A hearing is required. If a hearing is required, it will be on July 8, 2025, at 9:00 a.m. Attorneys may appear in person or remotely via zoom: Meeting ID 160 757 8308; Passcode: 485029. Face coverings are optional.

The Court no longer provides a court reporter in the Asbestos Law and Motion department. Parties may retain their own reporter, who may appear in the courtroom or remotely. A retained reporter must be a California certified court reporter (CSR), for only a CSR's transcript may be used in California courts. If a CSR is being retained, include in your email all of the following: Their name, CSR and telephone number, and their individual work email address.

There will be only one official record. If the parties cannot agree, the Court will designate a qualified court reporter to provide the official transcript for the matter, and the party or parties will bear the cost. | |

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share