DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
CGC24277258·sf·Civil·Asbestos
Hearing 8 months agoA hearing is required.

ROBERT SPANO VS. CARRIER CORPORATION ET AL

MOTION FOR WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY OF RECORD

Hearing date
Dec 30, 2025
Department
304
Prevailing
N/A

Motion type

Browse all Other rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffROBERT SPANO
DefendantCARRIER CORPORATION
DefendantJ-M Manufacturing Company, Inc.
DefendantJM Eagle

Attorneys

Florence A. McClain(Lewis Brisbois Bisgaard & Smith LLP)for Defendant

Ruling

SF Superior Court - Asbestos Law & Motion - CGC24277258 - December 30, 2025 Hearing date: December 30, 2025 Case number: CGC24277258 Case title: ROBERT SPANO VS. CARRIER CORPORATION ET AL Case Number: | | CGC24277258 | Case Title: | | ROBERT SPANO VS. CARRIER CORPORATION ET AL | Court Date: | | 2025-12-30 09:00 AM | Calendar Matter: | | MOTION FOR WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY OF RECORD | Rulings: | | On Asbestos Law and Motion Calendar for Tuesday, December 30, 2025, Department 304, Line 6.

Florence A. McClain of Lewis Brisbois Bisgaard & Smith LLP filed a Motion to be Relieved as Counsel for Defendants J-M Manufacturing Company, Inc. and JM Eagle. Conditional opposition filed by Plaintiffs. A hearing is required.

If a hearing is requested, it will be on December 30, 2025, at 9:00 a.m. Attorneys may appear in person or remotely via zoom: Meeting ID 160 757 8308; Passcode: 485029. Face coverings are optional.

The Court no longer provides a court reporter in the Law and Motion department. Parties may retain their own reporter, who may appear in the courtroom or remotely. A retained reporter must be a California certified court reporter (CSR), for only a CSR's transcript may be used in California courts. If a CSR is being retained, include in your email all of the following: Their name, CSR and telephone number, and their individual work email address.

There will be only one official record. If the parties cannot agree, the Court will designate a qualified court reporter to provide the official transcript for the matter, and the party or parties will bear the cost. =(304/EPS) | |

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share