DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
CGC24277208·sf·Civil·Asbestos Litigation
Hearing 6 months agoA hearing is required.

DAVID HARMS ET AL VS. SUPRO CORPORATION ET AL

MOTION FOR WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY OF RECORD

Hearing date
Feb 10, 2026
Department
304
Prevailing
N/A

Motion type

Browse all Other rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffDAVID HARMS
DefendantSUPRO CORPORATION
DefendantTRAVELERS INDEMNITY COMPANY

Attorneys

Hanna M. Thompson(Foley & Mansfield, PLLP)for Defendant

Ruling

SF Superior Court - Asbestos Law & Motion - CGC24277208 - February 10, 2026 Hearing date: February 10, 2026 Case number: CGC24277208 Case title: DAVID HARMS ET AL VS. SUPRO CORPORATION ET AL Case Number: | | CGC24277208 | Case Title: | | DAVID HARMS ET AL VS. SUPRO CORPORATION ET AL | Court Date: | | 2026-02-10 09:00 AM | Calendar Matter: | | MOTION FOR WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY OF RECORD | Rulings: | | On Asbestos Law and Motion Calendar for Tuesday, February 10, 2026, for 9:00 AM Department 304, Line 3.

Hanna M. Thompson of Foley & Mansfield, PLLP filed a Motion to be Relieved as Counsel for Defendant Travelers Indemnity Company (on behalf of Supro Corp.) Opposition filed by Plaintiffs. A hearing is required. If a hearing is requested, it will be on February 10, 2026, at 9:00 a.m.

Attorneys may appear in person or remotely via zoom: Meeting ID 160 757 8308; Passcode: 485029. Face coverings are optional.

The Court no longer provides a court reporter in the Law and Motion department. Parties may retain their own reporter, who may appear in the courtroom or remotely. A retained reporter must be a California certified court reporter (CSR), for only a CSR's transcript may be used in California courts. If a CSR is being retained, include in your email all of the following: Their name, CSR and telephone number, and their individual work email address. There will be only one official record. If the parties cannot agree, the Court will designate a qualified court reporter to provide the official transcript for the matter, and the party or parties will bear the cost. =(304/EPS) | |

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share