FRANCISCO SANTIAGO VS. JOSE SEGURA
Motion to be Relieved as Counsel
Motion type
Parties
Attorneys
Ruling
May 20, 2026, Law and Motion Calendar Judge Nicole S. Healy Department 28 ________________________________________________________________________
02:00 PM LINE 2 23-CIV-01467 FRANCISCO SANTIAGO VS. JOSE SEGURA
FRANCISCO SANTIAGO T. TROY OTUS JOSE SEGURA IVAN F. HIGUERA
Motion to be Relieved as Counsel
TENTATIVE RULING:
T. Troy Otus’s Motion to Be Relieved as Counsel is DENIED without prejudice.
“The notice of motion and motion, the declaration, and the proposed order must be served on the client and on all other parties who have appeared in the case.” (Cal. Rules of Court, rule 3.1362(d).) Otus has not suppllied sufficient proof that plaintiff Francisco Santiago was served notice of the correct hearing date of May 20, 2026, nor that defendant Jose Segura was served the declaration or proposed order. Accordingly, the motion is denied without prejudice to a renewed motion properly noticed and served.
If the tentative ruling is uncontested, it shall become the order of the court.
Cited authorities
Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities
Ask about this ruling
Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”