TROY REESE ET AL VS. MARTHA ALVAREZ ET AL
MOTION FOR LEAVE TO File Revised Cross Complaint
Motion type
Parties
Ruling
SF Superior Court - Real Property / Housing Dept 501 - CGC23605112 - September 9, 2026 Hearing date: September 9, 2026 Case number: CGC23605112 Case title: TROY REESE ET AL VS. MARTHA ALVAREZ ET AL Case Number: | | CGC23605112 | Case Title: | | TROY REESE ET AL VS. MARTHA ALVAREZ ET AL | Court Date: | | 2026-09-09 09:30 AM | Calendar Matter: | | MOTION FOR LEAVE TO File Revised Cross Complaint | Rulings: | | On the Real Property / Housing Motion calendar for September 9, 2026, line 2. Defendant's Motion for Leave to File Revised Cross-Complaint. Hearing Required.
No later than 9:00 a.m. on September 9, 2026 moving party to file (and provide a courtesy copy) of an amended proof of service clearly stating the name of the declarant. The proof of service on file does not state the name of the person signing the declaration. The signature does not provide the full name (first and last) of declarant either. =(501/CFH)
Parties may appear in-person, telephonically or via Zoom (Video - Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849; or Phone Dial in: (669) 254-5252; Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849).
Parties who intend to appear at the hearing must give notice to opposing parties and the court promptly, but no later than 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing unless the tentative ruling has specified that a hearing is required.
Notice of contesting a tentative ruling shall be provided by sending an email to the court to Department501ContestTR@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests. A party may not argue at the hearing if the opposing party is not so notified, and the opposing party does not appear. | |
Cited authorities
Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities
Ask about this ruling
Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”