DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
CGC23606372·sf·Civil·Real Property/Housing
Hearing 7 months agoSUSTAINED with leave to amend

WILL FREDERICKS ET AL VS. ROBERT FELTER ET AL

DEMURRER to Amended CROSS COMPLAINT

Hearing date
Jan 16, 2026
Department
501
Judge
Prevailing
Moving Party

Motion type

Browse all Demurrer rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffWILL FREDERICKS
DefendantROBERT FELTER
Cross-DefendantPETE BRANNIGAN
Cross-DefendantSOTHEBY'S INTERNATIONAL REALTY, INC.

Ruling

SF Superior Court - Real Property / Housing Dept 501 - CGC23606372 - January 16, 2026 Hearing date: January 16, 2026 Case number: CGC23606372 Case title: WILL FREDERICKS ET AL VS. ROBERT FELTER ET AL Case Number: | | CGC23606372 | Case Title: | | WILL FREDERICKS ET AL VS. ROBERT FELTER ET AL | Court Date: | | 2026-01-16 09:30 AM | Calendar Matter: | | DEMURRER to Amended CROSS COMPLAINT | Rulings: | | Real Property/Housing Court Law and Motion Calendar for January 16, 2026. Line 1.

CROSS DEFENDANT PETE BRANNIGAN, SOTHEBY'S INTERNATIONAL REALTY, INC. DEMURRER to Amended CROSS COMPLAINT is SUSTAINED with leave to amend for Cross-Complaints to explain the inconsistent allegations (See Cross-Complaint, First Amended Cross-Complaint and Discovery responses vs. Second Amended Cross-Complaint). Request for Judicial Notice is granted. All allegations must be made in good faith. =(501/CFH)

Parties may appear in-person, telephonically or via Zoom (Video - Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849; or Phone Dial in: (669) 254-5252; Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849).

Parties who intend to appear at the hearing must give notice to opposing parties and the court promptly, but no later than 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing unless the tentative ruling has specified that a hearing is required.

Notice of contesting a tentative ruling shall be provided by sending an email to the court to Department501ContestTR@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests. A party may not argue at the hearing if the opposing party is not notified, and the opposing party does not appear. | |

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share