DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
CGC22597838·sf·Civil·Real Property
Hearing todayDENIED without prejudice

HIGH POINT FINANCE LLC, A CALIFORNIA LIMITED VS. VIOLIE D. PASTOR, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS TRUSTEE OF ET AL

Notice Of Motion And Motion To Vacate Void Judgment Based Upon Extrinsic Fraud And Improper Ex Parte Communication With A Judicial Officer

Hearing date
Sep 9, 2026
Department
501
Prevailing
Plaintiff

Motion type

Browse all Other rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffHIGH POINT FINANCE LLC
DefendantVIOLIE D. PASTOR

Attorneys

H. Douglas Danielfor Moving Party

Ruling

SF Superior Court - Real Property / Housing Dept 501 - CGC22597838 - September 9, 2026 Hearing date: September 9, 2026 Case number: CGC22597838 Case title: HIGH POINT FINANCE LLC, A CALIFORNIA LIMITED VS. VIOLIE D. PASTOR, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS TRUSTEE OF ET AL Case Number: | | CGC22597838 | Case Title: | | HIGH POINT FINANCE LLC, A CALIFORNIA LIMITED VS. VIOLIE D. PASTOR, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS TRUSTEE OF ET AL | Court Date: | | 2026-09-09 09:30 AM | Calendar Matter: | | Notice Of Motion And Motion To Vacate Void Judgment Based Upon Extrinsic Fraud And Improper Ex Parte Communication With A Judicial Officer; Memorandum Of Points And Authorities; Declaration Of H. Douglas Daniel In Support; Request For Judical Notice | Rulings: | | On the Real Property / Housing Motion calendar for September 9, 2026, line 1.

Cross-Defendant's Motion to Vacate Void Judgment is DENIED without prejudice. Moving party may file the motion again supported by declarations of Lisa Meier and counsel who appeared at the trial call on September 15, 2026. The supporting brief must provide arguments and authorities supporting the conclusion that October 8, 2025 judgment "materially affects TATO's interest in the subject property." (Daniel Declaration, paragraph 6). Late-filed reply is stricken. =(501/CFH)

Parties may appear in-person, telephonically or via Zoom (Video - Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849; or Phone Dial in: (669) 254-5252; Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849). Parties who intend to appear at the hearing must give notice to opposing parties and the court promptly, but no later than 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing unless the tentative ruling has specified that a hearing is required. Notice of contesting a tentative ruling shall be provided by sending an email to the court to Department501ContestTR@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests. A party may not argue at the hearing if the opposing party is not so notified, and the opposing party does not appear. | |

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share