ALI A. AMINI ET AL VS. ANDREW LINTON ET AL
DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
Motion type
Causes of action
Parties
Ruling
SF Superior Court - Real Property / Housing Dept 501 - CUD25678272 - September 24, 2025 Hearing date: September 24, 2025 Case number: CUD25678272 Case title: ALI A. AMINI ET AL VS. ANDREW LINTON ET AL Case Number: | | CUD25678272 | Case Title: | | ALI A. AMINI ET AL VS. ANDREW LINTON ET AL | Court Date: | | 2025-09-24 09:30 AM | Calendar Matter: | | DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT | Rulings: | | Real Property/Housing Court motion calendar for September 24, 2025, line 11.
Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment is DENIED. Defendants have not shifted their initial burden to show that they have a complete defense to plaintiffs' cause of action based on nuisance. The Court notes that defendants' motion treats as dispositive legal arguments previously raised in their demurrers, which were each overruled. =(501/CFH)
Parties may appear in-person, telephonically or via Zoom [Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849; Phone Dial in: (669) 254-5252]. Parties who intend to appear at the hearing must give notice to opposing parties and the court promptly, but no later than 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing unless the tentative ruling has specified that a hearing is required.
Notice of contesting a tentative ruling shall be provided by sending an email to the court to Department501ContestTR@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests. A party may not argue at the hearing if the opposing party is not so notified and the opposing party does not appear. | |
Cited authorities
Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities
Ask about this ruling
Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”