DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
CVPS2602881·riverside·Probate·General Civil
Hearing todayGRANTED

CHAPMAN VS CHAPMAN

MOTION TO BE RELIEVED AS COUNSEL FOR DAVID CHAPMAN

Hearing date
Sep 8, 2026
Department
PS1
Prevailing
Moving Party
Next hearing
Oct 21, 2026

Motion type

Browse all Other rulings statewide →

Parties

DefendantDAVID CHAPMAN

Attorneys

Vincent Whittakerfor Defendant
Chandra Roamfor Defendant
Emma Yorkfor Defendant

Ruling

After meeting and conferring, the parties shall 10 days before the continued hearing date set above do one of the following:

(1) Defendant vacate the hearing on the demurrer, and file an Answer;

(2) The Parties file with the court a joint declaration stating the parties have agreed that Plaintiff will file an amended complaint before the date set forth above; or

(3) The Parties file with the court a joint declaration stating the means by which the parties met and conferred and identifying the specific objections in the demurrer and supporting memorandum of points and authorities that the parties were unable to resolve. (CCP §430.41(a)(3), CCP §435.5(a)(3).)

The court will not accept further briefing.

Case Management Conference continued to October 23, 2026. Parties are directed to not submit updated Case Management Statements for the next hearing date.

7.

CASE # CASE NAME HEARING NAME CHAPMAN VS MOTION TO BE RELIEVED AS

CHAPMAN COUNSEL FOR DAVID CHAPMAN Tentative Ruling:

Motion to be Relieved as Counsel GRANTED

Counsel to submit proposed order MC-053. Court will sign proposed order once submitted.

Attorneys Vincent Whittaker, Chandra Roam and Emma York are relieved as counsel of record for Defendant/Cross-Complainant David Chapman, effective upon the filing of the proof of service of the signed order upon the client.

Motion to Quash Deposition Subpoena for Production of Records is continued to October 21, 2026..

Case Management Conference is confirmed for October 21, 2026.

A status hearing re representation for Defendant/Cross-Complainant David Chapman is scheduled for October 21, 2026.

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share