DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
23STCV01833·la·Civil·Landlord-Tenant
Hearing in 5 daysGRANTED

Chilin, et al. v. Valjean Enterprises, LP, et al.

Petition for Minor's Compromise

Hearing date
Sep 14, 2026
Department
310
Prevailing
Moving Party
Appearance
Not required

Motion type

Browse all Petition rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffKatherinne Chilin
DefendantValjean Enterprises, LP

Ruling

Case No.: 23STCV01833 Matter: Petition for Minor's Compromise Ruling: The Petition is granted. Moving party to give notice. The Court encourages all parties to appear remotely via LA CourtConnect. If submitting on the Court's tentative ruling, please follow the instructions provided above. This is a landlord-tenant dispute. Katherinne Chilin, by and through her guardian ad litem, seeks to settle her claims. Court approval is required for all settlements of a minor's claim. (Probate Code Sec.Sec. 3500, 3600, et seq.; Code of Civ.

Proc. Sec. 372.) The Court has reviewed the proposed settlement and finds that it is fair and reasonable. Further, the Court finds the requested attorneys' fees/costs to be fair and reasonable. In light of the foregoing, the Petition to Approve Minor's Compromise is granted. Per California Rules of Court, Rule 7.952, Petitioner and Claimant must appear at the hearing, unless the Court finds good cause to excuse their appearance. The Court finds that no appearances are necessary. Petitioner to give notice.

Judge Kevin C. Brazile Department 310 Hearing Date: September 14, 2026 Case Name: Sandy Lane Holdings LLC, et al. v. Hankey Capital, LLC, et al.

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share