DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
26CU01248·fresno·Civil·Minor's Compromise
Hearing about 2 months agoGRANTED

Santana v. Jimenez

Petition to Compromise Minor’s Claim

Hearing date
Jul 1, 2026
Department
403
Judge
Prevailing
Moving Party
Appearance
Not required

Motion type

Browse all Petition rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffSantana
DefendantJimenez

Ruling

(20) Tentative Ruling

Re: Santana v. Jimenez Superior Court Case No. 26CU01248

Hearing Date: July 1, 2026 (Dept. 403)

Motion: Petition to Compromise Minor’s Claim

To grant. Order approving compromise signed. No appearance necessary.

Pursuant to California Rules of Court, rule 3.1312(a), and Code of Civil Procedure section 1019.5, subdivision (a), no further written order is necessary. The minute order adopting this tentative ruling will serve as the order of the court and service by the clerk will constitute notice of the order.

Tentative Ruling

Issued By: SMC on June 30, 2026. (Judge’s initials) (Date)

3

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share