Gloria Torres Sanchez, et al. v. 3620 W. 102nd Street, Inc., et al.
Minor's Compromise
Motion type
Causes of action
Monetary amounts referenced
Parties
Ruling
(Stanley Mosk Courthouse: Dept. 617) August 19, 2026 DEPARTMENT 617 LAW AND MOTION RULINGS
617 Date: 8-19-26 Case #: 24STCV10830 Trial Date: None Set MINOR'S COMPROMISE MOVING PARTY: Plaintiff, Gloria Torres Sanchez RESPONDING PARTY: Unopposed/Defendants, 3620 W. 102nd Street, Inc., et al. RELIEF REQUESTED Minor's Compromise SUMMARY OF ACTION On April 30, 2024, Plaintiffs Gloria Torres Sanchez, et al. filed the instant habitability action against Defendants 3620 W. 102nd Street, Inc., et al. On December 5, 2025, Plaintiffs substituted in Anza Management Company for Doe 2. RULING: Granted.
Plaintiff Gloria Torres Sanchez submits a petition for approval for minor's compromise on behalf of 9-year-old Alan Sanchez. The petition indicates a settlement of $90,000 with Defendants 3620 W. 102nd Street, Inc., Haresh Jogani, Jeet Jogani, Ritesh Desai, and Anza Management Company. The entire case is represented as settling for $1,500,000 (Attachment 11b(5)). The minor's allocation will be subject to $31,500 in attorney's fees and $2,690.21 in costs for a net deposit of $55,809.79. The Court finds the fees and costs reasonable. (Cal.
Rules of Court, rule 7.955.) The Court approves the petition. The minor's $55,809.79 net balance to be invested in the identified annuity (Attachment 18b(3)). Plaintiff to give notice. Dept.
617 Date: 8-19-26 Case #: 24STCV10830 Trial Date: None Set MINOR'S COMPROMISE MOVING PARTY: Plaintiff, Gloria Torres Sanchez RESPONDING PARTY: Unopposed/Defendants, 3620 W. 102nd Street, Inc., et al. RELIEF REQUESTED Minor's Compromise SUMMARY OF ACTION On April 30, 2024, Plaintiffs Gloria Torres Sanchez, et al. filed the instant habitability action against Defendants 3620 W. 102nd Street, Inc., et al. On December 5, 2025, Plaintiffs substituted in Anza Management Company for Doe 2. RULING: Granted.
Plaintiff Gloria Torres Sanchez submits a petition for approval for minor's compromise on behalf of 13-year-old Cesar Javier Bautista. The petition indicates a settlement of $90,000 with Defendants 3620 W. 102nd Street, Inc., Haresh Jogani, Jeet Jogani, Ritesh Desai, and Anza Management Company. The entire case is represented as settling for $1,500,000 (Attachment 11b(5)). The minor's allocation will be subject to $31,500 in attorney's fees and $2,690.21 in costs for a net deposit of $55,809.79.
The Court finds the fees and costs reasonable. (Cal. Rules of Court, rule 7.955.) The Court approves the petition. The minor's $55,809.79 net balance to be invested in the identified annuity (Attachment 18b(3)). Plaintiff to give notice. Dept. 617 Date: 8-19-26
Case #: 24STCV10830 Trial Date: None Set MINOR'S COMPROMISE MOVING PARTY: Plaintiff, Gloria Torres Sanchez RESPONDING PARTY: Unopposed/Defendants, 3620 W. 102nd Street, Inc., et al. RELIEF REQUESTED Minor's Compromise SUMMARY OF ACTION On April 30, 2024, Plaintiffs Gloria Torres Sanchez, et al. filed the instant habitability action against Defendants 3620 W. 102nd Street, Inc., et al. On December 5, 2025, Plaintiffs substituted in Anza Management Company for Doe 2. RULING: Granted. Plaintiff Gloria Torres Sanchez submits a petition for approval for minor's compromise on behalf of 17-year-old Kevin Alberto Bon Torres.
The petition indicates a settlement of $90,000 with Defendants 3620 W. 102nd Street, Inc., Haresh Jogani, Jeet Jogani, Ritesh Desai, and Anza Management Company. The entire case is represented as settling for $1,500,000 (Attachment 11b(5)). The minor's allocation will be subject to $31,500 in attorney's fees and $2,690.21 in costs for a net deposit of $55,809.79. The Court finds the fees and costs reasonable. (Cal. Rules of Court, rule 7.955.) The Court approves the petition. The minor's $55,809.79 net balance to be invested in the identified annuity (Attachment 18b(3)).
Plaintiff to give notice. Case Number: 24STCV33343 Hearing Date: August 19, 2026 Dept: 617 Dept. 617 Date: 8-19-26 Case #: 24STCV33343 Trial Date: None Set
Cited authorities
Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities
Ask about this ruling
Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”