ELAINE SCIACCA; ET AL. vs. AHMED ALSHERIF
Anti-SLAPP Motion
Motion type
Parties
Ruling
Plaintiff’s motion improperly seeks to compel further responses from multiple parties in one motion. Plaintiff’s initial motion did not include a separate statement of discovery requests at issue, as is required by Rule of Court 3.1345, and so did not allow Defendants an opportunity to respond to particular points of contention. Further, Plaintiff’s declaration in support of motion does not sufficiently detail Plaintiff’s efforts to meet and confer in good faith prior to filing a discover motion as it does not attach a copy of the meet and confer letter Plaintiff says he sent for examination, does not in the alternative specifically describe meet and confer efforts made, and does not sufficiently detail Defendants’ responses, if any.
ELAINE SCIACCA; ET AL. vs. AHMED ALSHERIF Case No. CU26-02679
Anti-SLAPP Motion
THE PARTIES ARE TO APPEAR.
Department 7 is inviting you to a scheduled ZoomGov meeting. Join ZoomGov Meeting https://solano-courts-cagov.zoomgov.com/j/1611554664?pwd=T3U4QlBGWWNWaGlieXJTcGxIVHRXZz09 Meeting ID: 161 155 4664 Passcode: 818575
One tap mobile +16692545252,,1611554664#,,,,*818575# US (San Jose) +14154494000,,1611554664#,,,,*818575# US (US Spanish Line)
Dial by your location +1 669 254 5252 US (San Jose) +1 415 449 4000 US (US Spanish Line) +1 669 216 1590 US (San Jose) +1 551 285 1373 US (New Jersey) +1 646 828 7666 US (New York) +1 646 964 1167 US (US Spanish Line) +1 833 568 8864 US Toll-free
Cited authorities
Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities
Ask about this ruling
Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”