| Case | County / Judge | Motion | Ruling | Indexed | Hearing |
|---|
DEMURRER to Amended COMPLAINT
SF Superior Court - Real Property / Housing Dept 501 - CGC25624373 - March 11, 2026 Hearing date: March 11, 2026 Case number: CGC25624373 Case title: AMANDA SILK VS. NAIM NAZZAL ET AL Case Number: | | CGC25624373 | Case Title: | | AMANDA SILK VS. NAIM NAZZAL ET AL | Court Date: | | 2026-03-11 09:30 AM | Calendar Matter: | | DEMURRER to Amended COMPLAINT | Rulings: | | Real Property/Housing Court Law and Motion Calendar for March 11, 2026. Line 2.2.
DEFENDANT HELEN NAZZAL, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS SUCCESSOR IN INTEREST TO NAIM NAZZAL (DECEASED) DEMURRER to Amended COMPLAINT is OFF CALENDAR.
Parties are ordered to meet and confer in accordance with CCP 430.41 in-person, by phone or videoconference no later than April 3, 2026 on a mutually agreed upon date. If parties cannot agree, parties shall meet and confer in-person at the Court (400 McAllister Street, San Francisco, CA 94102) at 1:30 p.m. on March 30, 2026. Defendant may file the demurrer upon the completion of the meet and confer conference if necessary and proper. Defendant shall not be charged an additional fee. =(501/CFH)
Parties may appear in-person, telephonically or via Zoom (Video - Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849; or Phone Dial in: (669) 254-5252; Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849).
Parties who intend to appear at the hearing must give notice to opposing parties and the court promptly, but no later than 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing unless the tentative ruling has specified that a hearing is required. Notice of contesting a tentative ruling shall be provided by sending an email to the court to Department501ContestTR@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests. A party may not argue at the hearing if the opposing party is not notified, and the opposing party does not appear. | |
Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities
Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”