DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
CGC25624373·sf·Civil·Real Property/Housing
Hearing 5 months agoOFF CALENDAR

AMANDA SILK VS. NAIM NAZZAL ET AL

MOTION TO STRIKE Amended COMPLAINT

Hearing date
Mar 11, 2026
Department
501
Prevailing
N/A
Appearance
Not required

Motion type

Browse all Motion to Strike rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffAMANDA SILK
DefendantNAIM NAZZAL
DefendantHELEN NAZZAL

Ruling

SF Superior Court - Real Property / Housing Dept 501 - CGC25624373 - March 11, 2026 Hearing date: March 11, 2026 Case number: CGC25624373 Case title: AMANDA SILK VS. NAIM NAZZAL ET AL Case Number: | | CGC25624373 | Case Title: | | AMANDA SILK VS. NAIM NAZZAL ET AL | Court Date: | | 2026-03-11 09:30 AM | Calendar Matter: | | MOTION TO STRIKE Amended COMPLAINT | Rulings: | | Real Property/Housing Court Law and Motion Calendar for March 11, 2026. Line 2.1.

DEFENDANT HELEN NAZZAL, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS SUCCESSOR IN INTEREST TO NAIM NAZZAL (DECEASED) MOTION TO STRIKE Amended COMPLAINT is OFF CALENDAR.

Parties are ordered to meet and confer in accordance with CCP 430.41 in-person, by phone or videoconference no later than April 3, 2026 on a mutually agreed upon date. If parties cannot agree, parties shall meet and confer in-person at the Court (400 McAllister Street, San Francisco, CA 94102) at 1:30 p.m. on March 30, 2026.

Defendant may file the motion upon the completion of the meet and confer conference if necessary and proper. Defendant shall not be charged an additional fee. =(501/CFH)

Parties may appear in-person, telephonically or via Zoom (Video - Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849; or Phone Dial in: (669) 254-5252; Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849).

Parties who intend to appear at the hearing must give notice to opposing parties and the court promptly, but no later than 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing unless the tentative ruling has specified that a hearing is required.

Notice of contesting a tentative ruling shall be provided by sending an email to the court to Department501ContestTR@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests. A party may not argue at the hearing if the opposing party is not notified, and the opposing party does not appear. | |

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share