RICHARD TOD SPIEKER AND CATHERINE REILLY SPIEKER, CO-TRUSTEES OF THE SPIEKER LIVING TRUST AND DOING BUSINESS AS STONE CREEK APARTMENTS VS. GLADIS PERAZA, ET AL.
DEFENDANTS: GLADIS PERAZA AND PEDRO SANCHEZ’S MOTION TO COMPEL FURTHER RESPONSES TO REQUESTS FOR PRODUCTION, FORM INTERROGATORIES AND SPECIAL INTERROGATORIES
Motion type
Browse all Motion to Compel Further Responses rulings statewide →
Parties
Attorneys
Ruling
August 31, 2026 LAW AND MOTION CALENDAR PAGE 22 Judge: HONORABLE DAVID A. SILBERMAN, DEPARTMENT 11 ________________________________________________________________________
02:00 PM 26-UDL-00935 RICHARD TOD SPIEKER AND CATHERINE REILLY SPIEKER, CO-TRUSTEES OF THE SPIEKER LINE 10 LIVING TRUST AND DOING BUSINESS AS STONE CREEK APARTMENTS VS. GLADIS PERAZA, ET AL.
RICHARD TOD SPIEKER AND CATHERINE REILLY SPIEKER, CO-TRUSTEES OF STEVEN T. NAUMCHIK THE SPIEKER LIVING TRUST AND DOING BUSINESS AS STONE CREEK APARTMENTS GLADIS PERAZA & PEDRO SANCHEZ PRO PER
DEFENDANTS: GLADIS PERAZA AND PEDRO SANCHEZ’S MOTION TO COMPEL FURTHER RESPONSES TO REQUESTS FOR PRODUCTION, FORM INTERROGATORIES AND SPECIAL INTERROGATORIES
TENTATIVE RULING:
Motion withdrawn by agreement of the parties.
POSTED: 9:56 AM
Cited authorities
Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities
Ask about this ruling
Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”