DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
CUD25678474·sf·Civil·Real Property/Housing
Hearing 12 months agoOFF CALENDAR, per the request of the moving party.

AMY BEASOM VS. KAIA ANDERSON-BUCKLEY ET AL

Notice Of Motion To Compel Discovery Responses; To Compel Production Of Documents; To Deem Requests For Admissions Admitted; And For Monetary Sanctions

Hearing date
Sep 8, 2025
Department
501
Judge
Prevailing
N/A

Motion type

Browse all Motion to Compel Discovery rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffAMY BEASOM
DefendantKAIA ANDERSON-BUCKLEY

Ruling

SF Superior Court - Real Property / Housing Dept 501 - CUD25678474 - September 8, 2025 Hearing date: September 8, 2025 Case number: CUD25678474 Case title: AMY BEASOM VS. KAIA ANDERSON-BUCKLEY ET AL Case Number: | | CUD25678474 | Case Title: | | AMY BEASOM VS. KAIA ANDERSON-BUCKLEY ET AL | Court Date: | | 2025-09-08 09:30 AM | Calendar Matter: | | Notice Of Motion To Compel Discovery Responses; To Compel Production Of Documents; To Deem Requests For Admissions Admitted; And For Monetary Sanctions | Rulings: | | Real Property/Housing Court Law and Motion Calendar for September 8, 2025 line 4.

DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO COMPEL DISCOVERY RESPONSES; TO COMPEL PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS; TO DEEM REQUESTS FOR ADMISSIONS ADMITTED; AND FOR MONETARY SANCTIONS is OFF CALENDAR, per the request of the moving party. =(501/SKF)

Parties may appear in-person, telephonically or via Zoom [Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849; Phone Dial in: (669) 254-5252].

Parties who intend to appear at the hearing must give notice to opposing parties and the court promptly, but no later than 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing unless the tentative ruling has specified that a hearing is required.

Notice of contesting a tentative ruling shall be provided by sending an email to the court to Department501ContestTR@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests.

A party may not argue at the hearing if the opposing party is not so notified and the opposing party does not appear. | |

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share