DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
25NWCV04646·la·Civil·Civil
Hearing todayGRANTED

TATENCO v. RAMOS

Motion to withdraw as counsel

Hearing date
Sep 3, 2026
Department
R
Judge
Prevailing
Moving Party

Motion type

Browse all Other rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffRichard Tatenco
DefendantRamos

Attorneys

Ruling

CASE NO.: 25NWCV04646 HEARING: Thursday, September 3, 2026, at 9:30 AM Barbara Maria Rodriguez, Esq.'s motion to withdraw as counsel of record for Plaintiff Richard Tatenco is GRANTED. Moving Party to give notice. The Court finds that Counsel has met the procedural requirements, including proper notice to the client at the last known residence or business address of the client. C.R.C. 3.1362. Here, Counsel's declaration indicates that there has been a breakdown of the attorney-client relationship. Where the issue (or conflict) is between the

lawyer and client(s), without implicating other parties, the court can rely on counsel's sworn declaration absent any reason to doubt the representations. There is an undisputed breakdown in attorney-client communications. It does not appear that Attorney Rodriguez's continued representation would serve the interests of justice. Counsel Rodriguez's motion to withdraw is GRANTED. The Court notes the following upcoming matters: On September 18, 2026, there is an Order to Show Cause Re: Sanctions for Plaintiff's failure to appear on May 13, 2026.

ALFARO v. NISSAN NORTH AMERICA, INC.

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share