Cabrera v. Ponc

Holbrook’s objections contained in his separate statement are OVERRULED. Objections are required to be separately filed. (Rule 3.1354(b).)

For the foregoing reasons, the motion is DENIED.

Holbrook’s request for sanctions is DENIED.

Holbrook is ordered to give notice. 12 Pham v. Tran, Before the Court is a motion by Brian W. Easton, Esq. in which he et. al. seeks to be relieved as counsel for plaintiff Dung Pham.

The Court finds the motion has been properly served on Mr. Pham. The Court also finds Mr. Pham will not be prejudiced by Mr. Easton’s withdrawal because trial has not been set. Further, because this motion is only brought by Mr. Easton, Mr. Pham will continue to be represented by Saul E. Wolf, Esq. (See Substitution at ROA 72) The Court also finds the motion generally complies with Rule 3.1362.

Accordingly, the motion is GRANTED.

The Court’s ruling will become effective upon the filing of a proof of service of the Court’s signed order on Mr. Pham.

Mr. Easton is ordered to give notice. 13 Cabrera v. Before the Court are two unopposed motions to be relieved as Ponc counsel of record for defendants Diego Ponce and P3Elite LLC filed by counsel Monica D. Dib and Nina Jafari. Both motions are GRANTED.

Each counsel has complied with the procedural requirements of California Rules of Court, rule 3.1362. The court finds good cause to grant the relief requested on the merits.

The order granting relief is effective upon filing of a proof of service of the signed order on the client.

Moving counsel shall give notice. 14 Black vs. A) Form Interrogatories Mercy House Living Centers Defendant Mercy House Living Centers’ (“Defendant”) unopposed motion to compel plaintiff Kevin Black’s (“Plaintiff”) further responses to form interrogatories is GRANTED.

Plaintiff appears to have failed to serve verifications with any of the interrogatories or requests for production. Failure to serve a verification is “tantamount to no responses at all.” (Appleton v. Superior Court (1988) 206 Cal.App.3d 632, 636.) Plaintiff has waived any objections to the Discovery as a result. (Leach v. Superior Court (1980) 111 Cal.App.3d 902, 906.)