DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
24STLC09164·la·Civil·Subrogation
Hearing todayGRANTED

State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company v. Arreguin, et al.

MOTION TO VACATE DISMISSAL AND REINSTATE CASE

Hearing date
Sep 2, 2026
Department
25
Prevailing
Moving Party
Next hearing
Oct 28, 2026

Motion type

Browse all Other rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffState Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company
DefendantLuis Arreguin
DefendantEnrique Arreguin

Ruling

(Spring Street Courthouse: Dept. 25) September 2, 2026 DEPARTMENT 25 LAW AND MOTION RULINGS *** The Judicial Officer Presiding in Department 25 is JUDGE JONATHAN H. EISENMAN *** Tentative Rulings are posted before the hearing.

If you desire to submit on the tentative ruling, you may do so by e-mailing Dept. 25 at the Spring Street Courthouse up until the morning of the motion hearing. The e-mail address is [email protected] . The heading on your e-mail should contain the case name, number, hearing date, and that you submit. The message should indicate your name, contact information, and the party you represent. The party submitting to the tentative must include to the e-mail any other party to the action.

Please note that if a party fails to appear at a law and motion hearing without having given notice under California Rules of Court, rule 3.1204, subd. (c), the court may take the matter off calendar, to be reset only upon motion, or may rule on the matter. If only one party has submitted, the Court may still hear the motion at the hearing or adopt the tentative ruling. Please note, the above e-mail address is ONLY to inform the court of your submission on the tentative ruling. All other inquiries will not receive a response.

All parties may appear remotely for law and motion hearings. A party may register to attend remotely by accessing the court's website at www.lacourt.ca.gov and by registering through LACourtConnect. This service is accessed via the "Online Services" tab at the top of the webpage, and by selecting "Remote Hearings" below the "Courtroom Services," then by selecting "Civil."

September 2, 2026 JUDGE /DEPT: Eisenman/25 CASE NAME: State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company v. Arreguin, et al. COMP. FILED: 12-16-24 CASE NUMBER: 24STLC09164 NOTICE: OK PROCEEDINGS: MOTION TO VACATE DISMISSAL AND REINSTATE CASE MOVING PARTY: Plaintiff State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company RESP. PARTY: None MOTION TO VACATE DISMISSAL (Code Civ. Proc., Sec. 473(b)) TENTATIVE RULING: The Court GRANTS State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company's motion to vacate the court-ordered dismissal for failure to appear at trial on June 15, 2026. The June 15, 2026 dismissal is hereby SET ASIDE AND VACATED. The Court ORDERS State Farm to SHOW CAUSE, on Wednesday, October 28, 2026 at 9:30 a.m. in Department 25 of the Spring Street Courthouse, why a default judgment has not been entered. SERVICE: [X]

Proof of Service Timely Filed (CRC, rule 3.1300) OK [X] Correct Address (CCP Sec.Sec. 1013, 1013a) OK [X] 16/21 Court Days Lapsed (CCP Sec.Sec. 12c, 1005(b)) OK OPPOSITION: None filed as of August 28, 2026 [] Late [X] None REPLY: None filed as of August 28, 2026 [] Late [X] None

ANALYSIS: State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company filed this subrogation action against Luis Arreguin and Enrique Arreguin. The Arreguins defaulted in February 2026. State Farm failed to file a timely default judgment package as to the Arreguins, and failed to appear for the June 15, 2026 non-jury trial. The Court ordered State Farm's complaint dismissed without prejudice for failure to prosecute.

State Farm now moves to have the dismissal vacated pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 473, subdivision (b)'s mandatory attorney-fault provision. A motion pursuant to the mandatory relief provision of Code of Civil Procedure section 473, subdivision (b), must be (1) timely, (2) in proper form, and (3) accompanied by an attorney's sworn affidavit attesting to the attorney's mistake, inadvertence, surprise, or neglect. (Code Civ. Proc., Sec. 473, subd. (b).) A court must grant relief if the party satisfies those requirements, unless the court finds that the default or dismissal was not actually caused by the attorney's fault. (Ibid.)

State Farm's motion, filed August 10, 2026, satisfies each of those requirements. Its counsel declares that the failure to appear was the result of counsel's "inadvertent clerical error." She further attests that she "failed to see the Third Amended Standing Order assigning a June 15, 2026 trial date" because it "was saved into the case file as one document labeled 'Conformed Summons and Complaint' . . . [and she] did not see any notices of hearings in the case file and did not have any hearings calendared."

State Farm's motion is not accompanied by papers curing the lapse that led to the dismissal, but State Farm represents to the Court that it "is still working on obtaining written declarations necessary to submit in support of its Default Judgment packet" and its counsel "has been diligently working to finalize the Default Judgment packet." The Court accepts that representation. (Austin v. Los Angeles Unified School Dist. (2016) 244 Cal.App.4th 918, 933.)

The Court GRANTS State Farm's motion. The June 15, 2026 dismissal is hereby SET ASIDE AND VACATED. The Court ORDERS State Farm to SHOW CAUSE, on Wednesday, October 28,

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share