Interinsurance Exchange of the Automobile Club v. Menendez, et al.
Motion to vacate dismissal
Motion type
Parties
Ruling
(Spring Street Courthouse: Dept. 25) September 1, 2026 DEPARTMENT 25 LAW AND MOTION RULINGS *** The Judicial Officer Presiding in Department 25 is JUDGE JONATHAN H. EISENMAN *** Tentative Rulings are posted before the hearing.
If you desire to submit on the tentative ruling, you may do so by e-mailing Dept. 25 at the Spring Street Courthouse up until the morning of the motion hearing. The e-mail address is [email protected] . The heading on your e-mail should contain the case name, number, hearing date, and that you submit. The message should indicate your name, contact information, and the party you represent. The party submitting to the tentative must include to the e-mail any other party to the action.
Please note that if a party fails to appear at a law and motion hearing without having given notice under California Rules of Court, rule 3.1204, subd. (c), the court may take the matter off calendar, to be reset only upon motion, or may rule on the matter. If only one party has submitted, the Court may still hear the motion at the hearing or adopt the tentative ruling. Please note, the above e-mail address is ONLY to inform the court of your submission on the tentative ruling. All other inquiries will not receive a response.
All parties may appear remotely for law and motion hearings. A party may register to attend remotely by accessing the court's website at www.lacourt.ca.gov and by registering through LACourtConnect. This service is accessed via the "Online Services" tab at the top of the webpage, and by selecting "Remote Hearings" below the "Courtroom Services," then by selecting "Civil."
September 1, 2026 JUDGE /DEPT: Eisenman/25 CASE NAME: Interinsurance Exchange of the Automobile Club v. Menendez, et al. COMP. FILED: 07-11-24 CASE NUMBER: 24STLC04952 NOTICE: OK PROCEEDINGS: MOTION TO VACATE DISMISSAL AS TO DEFENDANT SARAH MENENDEZ ONLY [CCP Sec. 473(d)] MOVING PARTY: Plaintiff Interinsurance Exchange of the Automobile Club RESP. PARTY: None MOTION TO VACATE DISMISSAL (Code Civ. Proc., Sec. 473(d)) TENTATIVE RULING: The Court DENIES Interinsurance Exchange of the Automobile Club's motion to vacate the dismissal entered against Sarah Menendez. SERVICE: [X] Proof of Service Timely Filed (CRC, rule 3.1300) OK [X] Correct Address (CCP Sec.Sec. 1013, 1013a) OK [X] 16/21 Court Days Lapsed (CCP Sec.Sec. 12c, 1005(b)) OK OPPOSITION: None
filed as of August 29, 2026 [] Late [X] None REPLY: None filed as of August 29, 2026 [] Late [X] None
ANALYSIS: Interinsurance Exchange of the Automobile Club filed this subrogation action against Sarah Menendez and Julie Aldana. It obtained a default against Aldana only, which it then agreed to set aside before dismissing the "[e]ntire action of all parties and all causes of action." Citing Code of Civil Procedure section 473, subdivision (d), Interinsurance now moves to vacate the dismissal as to Menendez only.
Code of Civil Procedure section 473, subdivision (d) allows the Court to correct its own clerical mistakes. The collision that was the genesis of this case happened almost four years ago. Menendez was served over two years ago. Dismissing the wrong party nearly a year ago was Interinsurance's mistake, not the Court's. (Romadka v. Hoge (1991) 232 Cal.App.3d 1231, 1235, fn. 2.)
The Court will not revive this action against Menendez now. The Court DENIES Interinsurance's motion. | Home -->)" -->
Cited authorities
Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities
Ask about this ruling
Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”