DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
CL0003474·nevada·Civil·Insurance Subrogation
Hearing 6 months agoCONTINUED

STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, vs. LUIS FERNANDO GUERRA

OSC re Dismissal

Hearing date
Mar 9, 2026
Department
Dept. A
Judge
Prevailing
N/A
Next hearing
May 25, 2026
Appearance
Not required

Motion type

Browse all Other rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffSTATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY
DefendantLUIS FERNANDO GUERRA

Ruling

March 9, 2026 Truckee Civil Law & Motion Tentative Rulings

1. CL0002298 WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A. vs. VICTORIA BOLSHAKOFF, an individual

No appearances required. On the Court’s own motion, the prove up hearing in this matter is continued to April 17, 2026 at 11:00 a.m. Plaintiff has failed to file a proof of service evidencing Defendant was served with a Notice of Prove Up Hearing and evidence of service of all documents as previously ordered. Plaintiff shall file a proof of service at least five (5) court days in advance of the continued hearing date evidencing what documents were served on Defendant, when they were served, and how they were served. In addition, Plaintiff shall serve Defendant with a Notice of Continued Default Prove Up Hearing forthwith.

2. CL0003437 Capital One, N.A. successor by merger to Discover Bank vs. Michelle Mattingly

No appearances required. On the Court’s own motion and in light of the Declaration filed by counsel for Plaintiff, the Court continues the OSC re Dismissal to May 11, 2026 at 1:30 p.m. in Dept. A. Plaintiff shall file a proof of service, an application to serve by publication (if deemed appropriate), or a request for dismissal of defendant in advance of the continued order to show cause date.

3. CL0003474 STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, vs. LUIS FERNANDO GUERRA,

No appearance required. On the Court’s own motion and in light of the Declaration filed by counsel for Plaintiff, the Court the instant OSC to May 25, 2026 at 1:30 p.m. in Dept. A. The Court anticipates and hopes Plaintiff will file its default judgment package well prior to the continued OSC date. Should a proper default packet be presented and approved by the Court with judgment entering, the OSC will be dismissed and the May 25th appearance date vacated.

4. CL0003487 Midland Credit Management Inc. vs. Jarrod Spencer

Appearance required by Plaintiff to show cause as to why this case should not be dismissed and/or Plaintiff sanctioned for failure to serve the Summons and Complaint on Defendant despite the fact this case has been pending for almost four (4) months. Absent good cause being shown, the Court intends, on its own motion, to set the matter for dismissal pursuant to CCP section 583.420 and vacate the trial date set for July 17, 2026 at 11:00 a.m.

5. CU0000657 Daniel Botwinis vs. Patrice Fleming et al

Please check back for a Tentative Ruling to be posted this afternoon.

6. CU0001273 Edward De Jesus Jimenez vs. Inderpreet Singh et al

Plaintiff Edward De Jesus Jimenez’ motion to compel Defendant United Parcel Service, Inc.’s responses to requests for production of documents, set three (“RFPs), and for sanctions, is 1

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share