DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
201700501277CUWT·ventura·Civil·Civil
Hearing todayThe motion to amend judgment is denied for the reasons set forth in the opposition. The motion requesting judicial notice/preclusive effect to the bankruptcy court’s findings and rulings is denied without prejudice.

Robert Smith vs. Coastmanagement.net

Motion to Amend Judgment and for Order Giving Preclusive Effect to the Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law of the United States Bankruptcy Court

Hearing date
Sep 2, 2026
Department
42
Judge
Prevailing
Opposing Party

Motion type

Browse all Other rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffRobert Smith
DefendantCoastmanagement.net

Ruling

201700501277CUWT: Robert Smith vs. Coastmanagement.net 09/02/2026 in Department 42 Motion to Amend Judgment and for Order Giving Preclusive Effect to the Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law of the United States Bankruptcy Court

Tentative Rulings:

The motion to amend judgment is denied for the reasons set forth in the opposition.

The motion requesting judicial notice/preclusive effect to the bankruptcy court’s findings and rulings is denied without prejudice.

Moving party to provide notice.

1

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share